Bring a taste of everyday life into your Sims’ kitchens and pantries with this collection of realistic grocery items. From fresh fruits like strawberries, peaches, and tomatoes, to pantry staples such as cup noodles, canned tuna, and juice bottles, this set has everything to make your Sims’ home feel lived-in.
Included are 15 detailed grocery goods, featuring:
Iced coffee & water bottles
Fresh fruits in supermarket-style packaging
Cup noodles & canned goods
Hershey’s syrup & egg tray
Pork sausage & more essentials
Perfect for decorating kitchens, pantries, or even setting up your own little market stall đź›’
It really is fucking nuts to see world leaders send condolences over this and sports teams hold moments of silence like Kirk was some great leader and not a fucking nazi podcaster
HE WAS A NAZI!! PODCASTER!! WHO SPENT HIS TIME YELLING “DEBATE ME!!!” AT COLLEGE (SOMETHING HE NEVER ATTENDED BECAUSE HE BELIEVED THAT A BLACK WOMAN BENEFITING FROM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION WOULD TAKE HIS PLACE) STUDENTS AND SAYING JEWS AND BLACK PEOPLE WILL REPLACE WHITE CHRISTIANS AND HIS DAUGHTER AGE 10 SHOULD HAVE A CARRY A PREGNANCY TO TERM IF RAPED
Why the goddamn shit have Canadian PM Mark Carney and British PM Keir Starmer released statements bemoaning the death of American Nazi podcaster Charlie Kirk
ive talked about being too high for things before but this is like. next level
opened the reblog editor to say the mom is obviously Carmen Sandiego but then realized I have zero justification for that whatsoever I’m just going off of vibes
I mean I always shipped Waldo of Where’s Waldo with Carmen Sandiego, and if you combine the respective outfits of both and whatever deranged bullshit Waldo was on, I can see them producing twin Clown Princes of Crime and Corporations.
imagine just saying “i always shipped waldo of where’s waldo with carmen sandiego” with no explanation whatsoever
what explanation could they need? they found each other.
@ brainsoupp_ on twitter// @stmichaelthearchangel// @ cybermrcury on twitter// @throughmy-eyez // @ shellerina on twitter// @caesarsaladinn// @ nelsoncj4 on twitter // @ heimberg_a on twitter// make your own kind of music by cass elliot// @ soledadfrancis on twitter// ? // @ sourcenectar on twitter// @superorganism
Many people like to (correctly) point out the hypocrisy of religious extremists claiming to “protect the children” by restricting their access to information. As has been proven time and again, knowledge protects children from harm, helps them to identify abuse, and teaches them ways to protect themselves proactively. An “innocent, pure” child is a euphemism for a child that is ignorant, kept in the dark about things that could harm them. No amount of distress brought on by learning disturbing information could endanger a child the way that information control can.
The issue with this criticism is that it misunderstands what conservatives mean by “protecting” children. They don’t think of children as independent beings who deserve dignity and respect. They think of them as future investments, cultural tokens, and blank slates to pour their dogma into. A church wants to “protect” children from information that might make them leave the faith, even if that information could improve the child’s life. A conservative parent wants to “protect” children from information about abuse, religious coercion, bodily autonomy… anything that could loosen the parent’s power and control over the child. What these groups are really “protecting” is their investment. They see children as property that they are entitled to groom and manipulate to whatever purposes they see fit, and they attack anyone and anything that suggests otherwise.